Long-Delayed Repair Brews Turmoil at a Manhattan Condo Owners File Lawsuit Against 2 Board Members Over Facade Collapse

(iStock.com)

In late January (as has been reported elsewhere), six residents of the St. Tropez condominium located on Manhattan's Upper East Side, filed a lawsuit against two board members of the association stemming from a rooftop facade collapse on December 7, 2015. The incident resulted in hundreds of bricks falling over 30 stories, and caused the evacuation of both the St. Tropez and a neighboring building, as well as the closure of five city blocks for nearly a week.

The suit alleges that despite “the threat of public safety and to the unit owners” presented, then-president Christopher Klein and then-vice president Sandeep Patel “failed to take any concrete steps to repair the facade collapse,” regardless of ongoing terrace and pool closures and an incident last August when a brick fell from the rooftop onto a parked car below. Claimants say that outside of emergency repairs ordered by the Department of Buildings immediately after the collapse, the facade problems went largely unaddressed while Klein and Patel allegedly went forth with a “complete gut renovation” of the lobby and a social room.

Since the ensuing collapse, the board has reportedly assessed its owners for some $6.8 million; Klein and Patel resigned from the board last December (they have not responded to media requests for comment). According to reports, no further progress regarding facade repair has since been made.

Legal Eagles Weigh In

Attorney T. Austin Brown with The Austin Brown Law Firm in New York City says that he has seen this type of “dangerous neglect” at residential properties of all stripes. But “in the case of condos, the boards are often unincorporated associations, which makes laying the blame a more interesting game.”

“I'm currently dealing with two cases involving leaking roofs that damage the buildings' top-floor apartments every time it rains,” Brown relates. “This is caused by the natural deterioration of the parapet wall, but the board or majority owners refuse to authorize payment or permits for anything more than re-tarring the roof. These cases can get frustrating because in some scenarios, agreements between owners and the board limit the right to sue. In general, potential buyers should be careful when purchasing, as sometimes a too-good-to-be-true monthly common charge is due to a board hesitant to spend money on repairs. And a board in turn should be aware that its failure to commit to essential repairs could lead to serious liability issues.”

But Thomas D. Kearns, a partner with NYC-based law firm Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP cautions against reading too much into the allegations at the St. Tropez.

“As the only public document right now is the complaint, we only hear one side,” he warns. “The board will no doubt use the business judgment defense on the merits of the case. The plaintiffs are likely using the allegations about the facade to get attention, as the complaint itself merely seeks a special meeting of the unit owners. [ed. Plaintiffs allege that they have, in accordance with the bylaws of the condominium, presented a petition with more than the necessary 25 percent in common interest required to hold a special meeting on the facade issue, but say they have been summarily ignored by respondents.] It's garden-variety corporate control litigation. Most condo and co-op charters permit a minority group – usually 25 percent – to call a special meeting."

“The real issue in these disputes is the Wild West of proxy solicitation, where neighbors ring doorbells to get proxies to petition for and attend these meetings,” Kearns continues. “Unit owners often don't understand what they are signing, or don't educate themselves about the issues facing the building.”

More to come on this case as it develops. Until then, stay on the lookout for falling bricks.

Mike Odenthal is a staff writer at The Cooperator.

Related Articles

Facade Inspections

What Do You Look For?

Facade Repair and Restoration

How to Know When It’s Time

Scaffolding

The Ups and Downs of Sidewalk Sheds

Facade Restoration

Taking Care of Your Building’s Exterior

What’s Old is New Again

Restoring Your Landmark Building

Skyscraper on Stilts

Residents Successfully Challenge New Development

 

3 Comments

  • "In general, potential buyers should be careful when purchasing, as sometimes a too-good-to-be-true monthly common charge is due to a board hesitant to spend money on repairs." That's the Cheapo pays double concept, which is exercised very much at my co-op. "And a board in turn should be aware that its failure to commit to essential repairs could lead to serious liability issues.”, which is a ticking time bomb at my co-op.
  • klein and Patel did not resign from the board. They resigned as President and VP respectively but are still on the Board. A 5 member majority on the board ,of which they are members of ,refused to recognize the petition which asked for a special meeting for the purpose of removing them from the board and tried to substitute it with a modified special meeting considering selective voting on each member of the board as to being removed or not. The law suit was brought about to force the stonewalling board majority to honor the initial petition for the removal of Klein and Patel before any other special meeting could be held with respect to board members being removed which was announced for 4/24. At this time the special meeting for the removal of Klein and Patel from the board will be held on that date instead.
  • A St. Tropez resident on Tuesday, March 27, 2018 6:39 PM
    Please note that Judge Shlomo Hagler of the Civil Division of the NY Supreme court ruled in favor of the unit owners. “You can’t stop democracy," he said.