Laying Down the Law Mediation-Arbitration V. Litigation

New York, my old home state, presently litigates all co-op and condo disputes. Litigation, however, continually proves to be an expensive and time-consuming endeavor. Perhaps it’s time for New York to consider compulsory mediation-arbitration before initiating court proceedings. Mediation is negotiated peacemaking and arbitration is a decision favoring one side over the other. The main benefit to both is that they take place outside of a courtroom setting, saving precious money and time. From beginning to end, the process runs about five months. Parties don’t have to lose endless hours from work while they wait around in stuffy, crowded, run-down courtrooms waiting for their cases to be called. Parties and witnesses appear once at the scheduled hearing date and that’s it. Court cases–even here–can take a couple of years to conclude. That shopworn phrase of "Justice delayed is justice denied" doesn’t apply to arbitration cases.

Listen Up, New York

Currently, Nevada and Texas are the only states that compel compulsory mediation-arbitration before parties can seek court redress. Nevada’s statute (Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 38.360 to 38.360), under which I serve as a mediator-arbitrator, is four years old; the Texas statute is one year old.

Nevada’s statute states: "No civil action may be commenced in any court in this state upon a claim relating to the interpretation, application or enforcement of any covenants, conditions or restrictions applicable to residential property, or any bylaws, rules or regulations adopted by an association, or the procedures used for increasing, decreasing or imposing additional assessments on residential property unless the action has been submitted to mediation or arbitration." In other words, no one can commence a civil suit relating to residential issues without first going through mandated mediation or arbitration.

Co-op and condo owners in New York are familiar with the typical association disputes found nationwide. Like New York, disputes in Nevada involve violations of "house rules" (regulations) such as disturbing noises, pets, placement of plantings, renovations of units, and littering in the common areas. Board election results, sponsor-developer control issues, and board failure to respond to shareholder concerns are all part of the arbitration punch list.

Read More...

Related Articles

Long-Delayed Repair Brews Turmoil at a Manhattan Condo

Owners File Lawsuit Against 2 Board Members Over Facade Collapse

Advocating for Residents

Organizations Go to Bat for Shareholders/Owners

421-a Tax Abatement Spared Via Revised Rent Regulation Bill

Developers to Retain Tax Break for Affordable Housing in New Construction – For Now

 

3 Comments

  • Can an Association alter or change the original CC&Rs, by way of stating new "rules and Regulations" that are more sringent or strict without the communities votes, as stated in the NRS guidelines. Case in point I have lived in my developement for 3 years. There were no stipulations in parking on the street, butr now the board as stated this is not acceptable and I now have been fined for thsi. No official vote has ever occurred. Nor presented for vote within the community?. At the time of our purchase majority of community parked and still do on the private street.( gated).There are other new stipulations that the board has called new "rules and Regulations" not CC&R changes. Also non have been filled appropriately with the state. Sincelrely, Donald Dexter
  • paying charges in common yet having incomplete basement with a loss of 154 sq feet - space which accomodates Boiler Room and all that it provides for our block, located under our living room. Should we not pay a lesser monthly charge amount? To whom might I enquire to seek fairness. Thanks. Sincerely
  • Hey Uncle Al! Happy Holidays. My son read your article and was very fascinated by it. I know your on vacation until the 22nd so when you get the chance give us a call -Love Rita, Stuart, Max, and kitty