New Citywide Smoking Policy for Residential Buildings to Go Into Effect This August What the Law Means for Condos and Co-ops

(iStock.com)

Starting August 28, 2018, all residential buildings with three or more units in New York City will be required to adopt a written smoking policy. This applies to rentals, co-ops, and condos.

The new ordinance, called Local Law 147, does not require buildings to ban smoking outright. On the contrary, it simply requires them to enact a policy in writing with regards to on-premises smoking rules.  

Keep in mind, however, that smoking in the common areas of residential buildings such as lobbies, gardens, hallways, and elevators is already prohibited. For all intents and purposes, this new ordinance requires that landlords, co-op corporations, and condominium associations take a definitive stance on whether or not they will continue to permit smoking in individual units, and must then codify that policy into their operating documents.

The Law Explained

David Berkey, a partner at Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, a law firm based in Manhattan, says: “The law now requires cooperatives and condominiums to formally adopt a smoking policy and to publish it so that all of the shareholders, their sublets, all unit owners, and their tenants become aware of what the smoking policy is. They either have to distribute it to each resident or post it in a conspicuous place. Any time there’s a change in the policy, they have to distribute or post it again. If there is a lease that’s being used in connection with the occupancy, the policy must be described clearly in the lease.”

The same goes for sales contracts on co-op and condo units as well. “What’s new here,” Berkey adds, “is the obligation to have a policy and to publish it, so that everyone is aware of it.”

Attorney Andrew Brucker of the New York office of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads explains that the new law doesn’t say you have to ban smoking. “It doesn’t say anything about what the policy should be," he says. "It just says you should have a written policy; everyone should have [a copy of] the policy, and everyone coming into the building should know what’s going on.”

Brucker adds that many of his co-op and condo clients are now thinking more about the subject. They are considering smoking bans within individual units, and are polling their residents to see what they want before creating a policy.

Legal Strategies

Berkey points out that in a co-op, “The policy can be adopted as a house rule, rather than amending the proprietary lease.” A house rule is deemed as incorporated into the proprietary lease. He says, however, that, “the question is whether the board has the power to adopt such a rule. It’s probably a more prudent path to amend the proprietary lease by requisite super-majority to adopt a total smoking ban by amendment, rather than house rule.”

The Cond-op Complication

Brucker brings up the inevitable complications involved in hybrid ownership forms.  In a cond-op -- which is a co-op property that is part of a larger condominium (usually one containing non-residential components), “The condo can pass a rule, but the house rules of a condominium are really only meant to control the common areas, not the interiors. Let’s assume the condominium says ‘no smoking’ in a courtyard, etc., but doesn’t speak to the units. If you have a cond-op, you need two actions: one by the condo, and one by the co-op. But typically, he continues, “the co-op controls both boards. To make certain the procedure is correct you need two votes, two meetings, two resolutions.”

Fines, Penalties, and Grandfathering

According to Berkey, if you have a rent-stabilized tenant who was allowed to smoke previously, that person is protected. “But a shareholder is not, because the proprietary lease says the shareholder is subject to any changes enacted by the board.” There’s no grandfathering in a co-op. The same is true in a condominium.

Brucker reports that there are penalties for not abiding by the new law -- up to $2,000 for multiple violations. But what about residents who smoke? “You have to give residents a break,” he says, “to either break the habit or sell the unit; many times the effective date on the new policy in the co-op will be a year from now, just to make sure people have a legitimate chance to comply.”

For more information check out the full city ordinance here.

AJ Sidransky is a staff writer at The Cooperator, and a published novelist.


Related Articles

Learn How to Deal With Smoking, Dogs and Bedbugs in Your Building

Big Apple CAI, CNYC to Hold Discussion on Feb. 20

Love Thy Neighbor, But Not Their Issues - Addressing Quality of Life Conflicts Between Residents

Presented by Kagan Lubic Leper Finkelstein & Gold LLP - 2017 Cooperator Expo New York

Will Complete Smoking Bans Catch on for Condos and Co-ops?

Making Sense of the Newest Smoking Bans

 

5 Comments

  • The discussions about this law both prior to and after its passage fail to consider the health effects of secondhand cigarette smoke, which can easily drift from one apartment to another. In 2006 the U.S. Surgeon General issued a report "The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Secondhand Smoke", concluding that "The scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke." see: https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/secondhandsmoke/executivesummary.pdf and: https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/secondhandsmoke/fullreport.pdf Again: "The scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke." In light of this fact, the federal government has banned smoking in all public housing apartments due to health concerns. And clearly this should have been the ONLY consideration in developing the NYC law. Instead the subject of health risks was never even mentioned at the city council hearing where the vote was taken. So the city is saying that in co-ops, unless 70% of the shares vote to ban smoking in apartments it's okay for apartment-dwellers to inhale cigarette smoke seeping in from other apartments. This is craven and irresponsible. Furthermore, allowing renters to be exempt from an anti-smoking policy in essence accepts secondhand smoke drifting into apartments near the smokers. The city did not leave it up to co-op shareholders to decide whether their building must ban lead paint, must address mold conditions, must require smoke and CO2 detectors and window guards when children are present. The city enacted laws to protect residents from dangerous conditions. So why is secondhand cigarette smoke being treated differently? Finally, the suggestion to provide smokers a year to stop smoking or relocate when a ban is place on smoking in apartments, this is clearly in the interests of the smokers but not their neighbors, who will continue to inhale the fumes for another year, to the detriment of their health.
  • BACK TO PROHIBITION? HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE????????
  • There is no need to ban smoking in a building - any potential second hand smoke issues can be solved with an air purifier and of insulating gaskets and caulk. No reason that smoke should effect another unit.
  • Hello there, Whoever owns an air purifier knows that they don't work, specially when people are smoking right in front on the main entrance and you live on the second floor. I own 3 air purifiers. I live in a coop. What is the best approach to take care of the problem when I know that the super and most of the people on his crew smokes?
  • It is funny to have government control your building while they still sell a product that anyone over 18 can easy get from any local grocery store.