Non-Resident Board Members How Do They Affect Operations?

For many reasons, common-interest communities such as co-ops, condominiums, and HOAs prefer that the people living in the community’s units be the actual owners of those units – rather than renters, or subtenants, or relatives of the owners. The conventional wisdom here is that owner-occupants have a more deeply vested interest in the overall health and smooth operation of their community than non-resident owners, because it’s their actual property – not some faceless landlord’s. Same goes for board members – it seems pretty obvious that someone serving on their building or association board will be more effective and engaged if they actually live in the building or association, and not several states away.

Ownership Possibilities

In the world of common-interest communities, the vast majority of owners are also occupants. They purchase their unit as a primary residence, and live there the majority of the time. But other possibilities do exist. In some communities, particularly in existing apartment buildings that have been converted to co-op or condominium ownership, any number of units may be owned by the original landlord or building owner – usually referred to in this instance as the sponsor. These units may be encumbered by holdover tenants who didn’t opt to purchase their unit when the building converted, and who in turn may be subject to various rent regulations, such as rent stabilization in New York City.

In newly-constructed buildings, there may be some number of units still owned or retained by the developer. These may also be rented to non-owners, but are not likely to be subject to older rent regulations designed to protect tenants who chose not to purchase their units, such as in the above-mentioned conversions.

Lastly, in either existing conversions or new construction, there is the possibility of investor units; apartments that have been purchased by a third party and operated as a source of investment income as one would any rental property. An investor could own one unit or many; the maximum number usually dictated by the community’s governing documents.

Board of Directors: Who May Serve?

According to Phyllis Weisberg, an attorney with Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads, which has locations in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, at the state level in New York and elsewhere, “There is no residence requirement to serve on the board of a co-op or condo.” Rather, “One must look at the bylaws.” Weisberg also points out that for co-ops in New York, which are subject to the BCL—the Business Corporation Law—there is no residency requirement unless provided for in the community’s bylaws.


Related Articles

Non-Resident Board Members

Managing Absentee Decision Makers

Airbnb vs. COVID-19

Governors, Boards & Residents Support Short-Term Rental Ban

Capital Gains and Capital Improvements

When Does a Repair Become a Renovation?



  • You can include a bum to your list of unusual board presidents. Last year we had elections and one such creature was elected president. It has never held a job, lives off his mother, has no education, and lives in an empty apartment, but his supporters where fine with that as they share similar views on stinginess and on building neglect and disrepair. The guy is over 18 as the article points out. Is 51 years old. I expect that in the near future I will provide a follow up comment as to how good that has worked out for the benefit of the community.
  • I would like to add further superb qualifications of that co-op board president, who is also the treasurer. He previously went though chapter 7 bankruptcy and had an eviction. The vice president, the other board member, is an investor, lives 50 miles away, broke her agreement with the co-op not to sub-let. Then there is a clueless Director without a position, just there to try to make things appear good on paper. So much for a little diversity being a good thing.
  • Investors at my condo complex do not attend board meetings, and do not contribute to overall maintenance. They don't seem to care about looks and upkeep. They are a detriment to the community, and care only about their rental income. Unfortunately, the Board President is a non-resident whose son is also on the Board, lives here, but does not have ownership. It's a mess. As the previous commenter stated, things "appear good on paper."