Our building recently put in a gym. One board member has made himself the
spokesman for the gym and emails our 80 members directly with cheerful updates
and information. I have said that all communications to shareholders should
come through the management company from either management or the entire board.
In my opinion no individual member should take ownership of a particular issue.
While the president of the board told me that she agrees with me, and would
speak with this board member, she has taken no action and he continues his
campaign. In my opinion, he is using this as a platform so that he will have high
awareness in the building for the annual election. He has said that he has no
intention of stopping. I believe that, if I could get an opinion that this is
against best practices, he would stop.
“It is best practices for boards to promulgate comprehensive confidentiality and
communication policies,” says Leni Morrison Cummins, an attorney and member of the Manhattan law firm of
Cozen O’Connor. “Such policies govern both the content and delivery of communications from the
board. It is common for boards to adopt rules regarding who may send out communications—many boards choose to have the managing agent act as the sole conduit of
information from the board to the shareholders. It is also common for boards to require that all communications to the
shareholders on behalf of the board or its members (in their capacity as board
members) must first be approved by the board.
“If the spokesman board member is communicating information on behalf of the
board in violation of board policies or directives, his behavior is improper. If the spokesman board member is communicating information on behalf of himself
(not in his capacity as a board member) by using a means of communication only
available to the board member by virtue of his membership on the board (such as
an internal building database or email distribution list), his behavior is
improper. Further, to the extent that the spokesman board member is acting in furtherance
of his own self-interest, his actions could be found to be a breach of his
fiduciary duty of good faith.
“However, if the spokesman board member is disseminating information acceptable
to the board, on behalf of the board, in accordance with its policies (which
may be laissez-faire), then there is nothing wrong with him doing so, even if
it does help his campaign for the next election. If this is the situation, the writer should focus on encouraging the board to
adopt a policy governing board communications to shareholders.”