Q&A: When Someone Is Refused Ownership

My son-in-law inherited his father's co-op in Manhattan. For two years he's been paying the upkeep charges without being able to live there, yet has been refused "ownership" by the co-op board. He has a considerable amount of cash available, owns a co-op in New Jersey and a house in Greenport, New York that has no mortgage. However, his income, combined with his wife (she is a social worker, he is a luggage designer) is under $100,000 a year. What are their options?

—Concerned Father-in-Law

“Many proprietary leases provide that the board of directors will permit the assignment of the proprietary lease and transfer of the appurtenant stock to a member of the decedent’s family who is financially responsible,” says Peter G. Goodman, partner at the New York law firm of Smith Gambrell & Russell, LLP, formerly with Hartman & Craven. “In this case it appears either that the proprietary lease did not have this provision or that the board of directors of the cooperative corporation did not deem the son-in-law to be qualified for ownership. The result is that the son-in-law is the equitable owner of the cooperative apartment and is entitled to the net proceeds of the sale of the apartment by the estate to a third-party. Under these facts, the son-in-law is not entitled to be the record owner of the apartment nor is he entitled to occupy the apartment.”

Related Articles

Boards and the Law

How Statute and Governing Documents Intersect

Bankrolling the Board

The Question of Compensation

The Co-op as Legal Entity

New York City’s Housing Model



  • People who are finally approved to buy into a co-ops are stupid. Buy a condo people you do not need to be board approved and own it and can sell or leave it in a will to whoever you want. Co-ops boards are very discriminating people look at one person the wrong way and you can forget about buying no matter how much money you have