Understanding Apartment/Home Tax Inequity A Taxing Problem

The old saying goes that the only two sure things in life are death and taxes. According to the experts, for owners of co-ops and condos in New York City, there's a third inevitability: you're going to be taxed at a higher rate than owners of single-family homes.

Pared down to its basics, the disparity of the city's real estate structure seems simple. Single, two- and three-family homeowners pay less in property taxes than condo and co-op owners whose apartments are of equal value. To compensate for the apparent inequity, co-op and condo owners receive government-mandated tax abatements.

One might think that would settle the issue, but the reality is that there's nothing "simple" about real estate taxes in New York. Talk to a few experts, and the people working for tax equity, and the more you learn, the more complicated things get. Some experts even disagree as to how unjust the inequity is.

Unequal Taxation

How did this current system of taxation come about? Back in 1981, the state instituted property tax legislation called S7000A. This legislation came about in response to a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of assessment of property values all across the state, including New York City. Even though it was created for this purpose, "Under S7000A, the city's property tax has grown even more tilted in favor of owners of one-, two-, and three-family homes than it had been in 1981," according to a December 2006 report by the Independent Budget Office (IBO), a non-partisan, publicly-funded agency that offers budgetary, economic, and policy analysis for city residents and elected officials.

The legislation created the current system that divides property into 4 classes, which are all taxed on a different share of each class's assessed value. One-, two- and three-family residential property and small condominiums (3 or fewer units) are considered Class 1. According to the Department of Finance, there are currently 691,736 Class 1 parcels (or structures), and 1,051,733 Class 1 units within those structures in the city. Cooperatives and condominiums are considered Class 2 properties, which includes all multiple dwellings. The Department of Finance identifies 186,974 of these Class 2 parcels, and 1,742,068 units within those parcels. Class 3 consists of regulated utility property. Class 4 consists of all other real property, such as office buildings, factories, stores and vacant land.

Read More...

Related Articles

Give Me a J-51

Expanding Tax Abatement Program Will Help With Co-op & Condo Maintenance

How NY Homeowners Can Benefit From the STAR Program

Be Also Mindful of Some Recent Changes

Getting Politicians to Care About Your Building

A Guide to Engaging Local Officials

Q&A: Can a board claim my STAR abatement check as an assessment?

Q&A: Can a board claim my STAR abatement check as an assessment?

Q&A: It’s in the STAR’s

Q&A:It’s in the STAR’s

Verifying Square Footage

How Property Owners Can Save on Taxes

 

Comments

  • What about the disparaity in j-51 abatements granted to condo units within the same condo association? I recently discovered that 6 owners in our condo association have been receiving a 100% J-51 tax abatement since 2004. Meanwhile, the remaining 4 owners (including myself) have only been receiving a 40% J-51 tax abatement. (I shold mention that our condo association is composed of two buildings, around the corner from each other. The two buildings were developed at the same time by the same developer.) The owners in my building feel cheated and want to know why we have only been receiving a 40% J-51 abatement. In addition, we now feel a bit resentful of the condo members in our sister building, because for 5 years they have not been paying any taxes. Is there any way to explain this discrepancy? Is it legal for this disparity to exist? And, more importantly, what can the owners do in my builidng to convince the city that we should be receiving the same abatement as the other owners in our condo association? Thank you.