New York City Changes Codes Requires More Frequent Elevator Inspections

New building codes went into effect on July 1, 2008 that have completely revamped the inspection and testing procedures for elevators, escalators and other vertical transportation equipment in buildings. The new and more stringent elevator/escalator code brings with it more—and more costly—requirements for building owners and managers in the form of more frequently mandated contractor tests and the requirement of third-party witnessing.

General Info & Extra Responsibilities

During 2008, the existing inspection and test procedures remain in effect. A Local Law 10/81 inspection is due to be filed for all elevators before September 30, 2008, and any two- or five-year tests due this year must be still be performed

Beginning January 1, 2009 however, the old system of annual Local Law 10/81 inspections and two-year tests will end. They are being replaced with a combined annual inspection and test for all elevators and escalators which must be performed (now known as a periodic inspection and Category One test) every year.

This inspection/test will now have to be performed by one company, and witnessed by another. The typical way this will work is that the building’s usual maintenance contractor will perform the test, with a third-party private inspection agency hired by the owner to witness the test. The witnessing company cannot be affiliated with the maintenance contractor performing the test. When a five-year test is due on a roped elevator, a combined periodic inspection and Category Five test must be performed and witnessed by a third party. The Category Five test and periodic inspection in specific years when due, must be performed prior to the expiration date of the previously performed test. However, the Category One test and periodic inspection for all other years can be performed at any time during the calendar year.

Increased Costs for 2009

Customarily, elevator maintenance contracts cover two-year tests and five-year tests (which would be three total tests during each five-year period). This means that within a five-year period, there will now be two additional annual tests for roped elevators and three additional annual tests for hydraulic elevators to be performed by the maintenance contractor. Building owners/managers should expect the maintenance contractor to charge between $700 and $1,000 dollars per additional elevator annual test and twice that amount ($1,400 to $2,000 dollars) per elevator for the five-year test. The five-year test takes twice as long as the annual test as it requires a weight test procedure. Weights equal to the total weight capacity for which the elevator is rated must be placed in the cab, and the elevator must run at full speed to each floor.

Read More...

Related Articles

Keeping the Outside Safe

Securing Building Exteriors

A Look at Elevator Maintenance

The Ups and Downs of Elevator Replacement and Repair

Q&A: Assembling Peaceably

Q&A: Assembling Peaceably

 

10 Comments

  • An elevator consultant is telling you that the cost of the witness is $450 for the schedule 1 tests and $900 for the schedule 5 test, as he is going to collect the fee from you. If you have a building that has four elevators in it, you are going to pay this man $1,800 for one days work, same goes for the schedule 5 test. In addition, your elevator company is now going to do less work per year, as they no longer have to do all of the annoying paperwork. Do not let these people take advantage, as that is all this code change is doing. The elevator consultants got in the ear of the building department in order to make money for themselves. That is all that this is about, money, and do not think for a minute that these people were doing this for your safety, all it is about is lining their pockets.
  • Jim, you are wrong. I am an elevator consultant who DOES not do any mandated or fee type inspections. I am a strong advocate for the new rules for a very basic safety reason. In the past elevator maintenance firms could and most often did perform and witness their own tests. This often resulted in "The fox watching the chicken coop" with violations overlooked. The same is true for allowing the elevator companies to self-certify violation compliance, many times we see a follow-up inpsection by the NYC DOB that shows the violations were neber corrected. I have no horse in this race, only a concern for the safety of the riding public. Feel free to contact me for more information. Patrick A. Carrajat
  • Of course the DOB will write a violation even if it is just "no access"; private agencies performed this task for the DOB and I am sure there is some unofficial "quota", like parking tickets. Even if they went back and the pit was dirty, etc. that does not mean the elevator company did not do the work right the first time. The real problem is the buildings NOT getting violations are usually the most dangerous projects with slumlords as owners. I think the city is doing it more to "add a layer " and reduce their responsibility. Even if they are in it to make money (that's capitalism), as long as the third-party witness agency is honest and has no motive to pass an unsafe elevator, this should work. Many elevator companies are not adverse to violations as it can create compulsory repair work which the customer may not have previously agreed to do because of the additional expense to them. One of the problems lies with the city not thoroughly thinking this out as to how the paperwork is getting to the building owner, witness agency and elevator co. and then to them in the alotted time frame; if the test failed, what incentive does the elevator maintenance co. or even the owner have to sign the report and get it back to the witness agency to file in time? Perhaps they should have started with one small borough only to work out the kinks. As it is, I foresee changes and actually hope they allow the witness agency to file their report without the elevator company's signature and the elevator co. to file their own paperwork which would then be compared to the inspector's observations. A building that can afford to have an elevator should most certainly be able to afford the additional expense, even at an average of $1500 per device for the elevator co. and the witnessing per year; the city has not raised the $30 fee, so obviously they are not in it for the money. There are so many agencies out there that it makes sense to shop around for the best-qualified which need not be the most expensive.
  • I could not agree more with the unknown user. As a building owner you should shop around for a third party inspection agency. That is best qualified. And only interest is providing you with a honest and accurate report. This should not include consulting companies. who are known to do what is in their best interest even if it hurts their customers. This is comming from a person who has thirty years of experiance in every aspect of the elevator industry. Do yourselves a favor shop around, i work for one of these companies . And honest , hard working and caring people still exist.
  • I like the safety part but the price should have been set by NYC just like car inspections are. Now witness companies charge $400 to $1000 per each device and Elevator companies charge another $800 to $1200 per device. This includes Elevators and lifts including Material, Handicap, Dumbwaiters etc. So a building like mine with 3 Elevators, 1 Handicap Lift, 1 Street Car and one Dumbwaiter cost us an extra $ 10,000 a year to inspect and that is a lot of money for any buisness to pay. Not Fair.
  • Can you please explain about Wire Rope Tension Testers for testing elevators' ropes.
  • a consultant with a licence who never worked on an elevator testing an elevator more elevator safety issues
  • I was told by an elevator company that the Category Five testing is required on a traction elevator or roped hydro and NOT for a standard hydro. Is this true?
  • I am a Mechanical Engineer by trade and have seen how third party witnesses work- they do nothing and collect a fee. At prices being charged, this is only a new revenue generating scheme by the City of New York. This is certainly not a safety issue, it is a money issue as the City is desperate to increase revenue.
  • "Safety".....what a joke. This is pure revenue for the state and the bureaucrats that get their pockets lined. There are no safety issues with elevators. Elevators are the safest form of transportation. Nothing has really happened that we now need greater government enforcement on these conveyances. How are these buildings going to pay for all these new requirements? Things are just going too far. I've been working on elevators for 12 Years, the only people that get injured or killed is us elevator mechanics. There might be a very rare occasion that a passenger is injured or killed, but check the stats. For the amount of people who ride elevators everyday, the chance of anything happening is one in a million. More people die from rolling off their bed. Do we need bedroom inspectors and test witnesses now too?