Q&A: Opting Out
At a meeting recently I questioned our board president as to whether the mortgage holder will go along with our “going private.” He assured me that there would be “no problem.” His reply, it seems to me, is predicated on the assumption that our balance sheet will not change substantially. However the current plan is to use 2/3 of our reserves to pay the extremely large increase in real estate tax.
If we leave Mitchell Lama protection, we will lose our tax abatement. Our balance sheet will be radically changed. The amount of reserves to be used does not even cover the first year of increased taxes. We would hope that the “flip tax” generated by private sales of apartments would be large enough to carry us forward. Especially in the current real estate market this sounds problematic to me.
Do I have the right to contact the mortgage holder to ask my question? Is there anything more I can do?
—Financially-Wary OwnerA Looking at process first, Van Der Tuin explains, “Inquiries to third parties with whom a cooperative has relationships—such as the mortgagee in this instance—should not be undertaken without authorization from the board of directors. First, the mortgagee should not, and probably will not, provide you with any substantive response. Second, if you do undertake the inquiry, you risk doing or saying something that may interfere with or disrupt the cooperative’s business relationship with the mortgagee and therefore create unintended adverse consequences for yourself or the cooperative. So my advice is, no— don’t contact the mortgagee unless you have been authorized to do so by and for the board. If you have concerns, share them with the board members and your fellow cooperators to make sure the issues are fully understood before going down the ‘private’ path.
“As to substance, the issue is not really whether the mortgage holder will consent to the change in your balance sheet and income statement resulting from ‘going private.’ The subsidized low-interest mortgage must be paid off and refinanced as part of the process. It is likely that the refinancing with a market-rate mortgage will substantially increase the cooperative’s monthly mortgage costs, in addition to the increase in real estate taxes. Without knowing the details as to your cooperative’s present, and anticipated, capital structure, it is not possible to advise you as to what the total impact of withdrawing from the Mitchell-Lama program may be. For a good overview of the issues, positive and negative, you may wish to read the excellent article ‘Going Private’ by Richard B. Montanye, CPA, published in The Cooperator in its Dec./Jan. 2003 edition.”